BG
Want to know more?  Contact AG Elrod for advice.
Contact
Emma de Brabander
Labour conditions - universities
universities@hetpnn.nl

In this section we outline the most important aspects of the start of PhD programmes for PhD students. It is important to note that in the Netherlands not all PhD candidates work on their thesis under the same conditions. Below you will find the relevant information, depending on the type of contract or agreement that applies. Do you not know what kind of contract you have? Go to this page to find out!

PhD candidate in the service of university

The contract for employee PhD candidates is a temporary employment for the expected duration of the promotion process. When you start, your employment is determined for a certain period of time.

In principle, your employment lasts four years, based on a full working week (38 hours). National employment law limits the number of subsequent temporary employment contracts that an employee may receive. This is the so-called chain determination. In the case of collective labour agreement, it is stipulated that certain functions, including PhD candidate, are excluded from the chain determination. This means that there are no restrictions on the number of consecutive temporary employment. On the basis of the collective labour agreement, there is always room for an extension of the contract.

4 years, 3 years, ‘2+3’ years? From July 2018, the collective labour agreement determines that the duration of contracts of employee PhD candidates is four years. That is why most PhD candidates have positions in the Netherlands a duration of four years. However, in some cases, the PhD programme is treated as a ‘consolidated’ version of the research master’s programme (2 years) and the actual PhD programme (3 years). Because the university appoints the candidate as an employee-propose student for three years instead of four years, this ‘2+3’ model is said to save time and money, without compromising quality and depth. In the Netherlands there are already a number of scientific disciplines where the PhD programme has this consolidated form, such as communication sciences and economic sciences. Although the wording of the employment contract offers this leeway, it should be emphasized that PNN is strongly opposed to the ‘2+3’ model, as is explained in our Employment Conditions Monitor, among others. There is no clear evidence for the benefits of shortening the PhD trajectory, other than cost savings for universities.

Want to know more? Contact Emma de Brabander for advice.

Emma the Brabander

Portfolio Benefits – Universities

The universities(at)hetpnn.nl

PhD candidate in UMC

The contract for employee PhD candidates is a temporary employment for the expected duration of the PhD programme. When you start, your employment is determined for a certain period of time.

However, the contract for PhD students in University Medical Centers (UMCs) may vary significantly depending on their background. Medical doctors are hired as MD-PhDs, which is often a 3-year contract, based on a full 36-hour workweek. Other PhD students within UMCs are often OIOs (researcher-in-training). Usually the duration of the employment for OIOs is four years, also based on a full work week of 36 hours. However, exceptions are also possible. PhD candidates can also be hired as a ‘researcher’ and start with a contract with a duration of 1 or 2 years, for example if awarded grants are not sufficient to finance a full PhD programme.

National employment law limits the number of subsequent temporary employment contracts that an employee may receive. This is the so-called chain determination. In the case of collective labour agreement, it is stipulated that certain functions, including PhD candidate, are excluded from the chain determination. This means that there are no restrictions on the number of consecutive temporary employment. On the basis of the collective labour agreement, there is always room for an extension of the contract.

Want to know more? Contact Martine van der Linde for advice.

Martine van der Linde

Portfolio Conditions of employment – hospitals

hospitals(at)hetpnn.nl

PhD candidate not in service

Because this group is so diverse, including both external, externally funded and stock market PhD students, there are very few guidelines and most cases are decided in consultation with each individual institution. These agreements usually include things like the courses to be followed, access to grants and funding, scholarships, etc.

Regardless of the local rules, it is very important that an agreement is made between the PhD student and the institution at the start of the PhD process. This agreement should include clear agreements on crucial aspects of the process, such as guidance, training, use of facilities (e.g. office space and laboratories), university services, etc. This is usually included in what is known as a ‘Training and Supervision Plan’ (TSP).

Bench fees or tuition fees are another important point to consider at the start of the PhD course as a non-employee-propose company. Dutch institutions may charge these costs to cover the costs of supervision, registration or access to laboratories or other facilities. In this respect, PNN’s recommendation is to always make clear agreements about how much you pay (and for which) and whether there is any form of compensation (for example, as a supplement to exchanges that do not meet the minimum required by immigration authorities).

There are no rules about a difference in costs for external and stock market PhD candidates. However, some universities tend to charge higher fees to scholarship PhD students (usually covered by the grant provider), which means they may also have access to more facilities. Unexpected changes or increases in costs can occur as a non-employee-proceeding company during your journey, so it is important to determine the conditions of your affiliation with the institution from the beginning as clearly as possible.

Want to know more? Contact Teebah Abu-Zahra for advice.

The Teebah Abu-Zahra

Labour conditions – external, international and scholarship PhD candidates
bibspromovendi(at)hetpnn.nl

Are you currently experiencing issues during your PhD that you need help with?

Most institutions have a number of contact points for help. This compass is designed to help you find the right support.

In the drop-down menu you can select the institution that you are doing your PhD at. Then the roadmap will show you available contact points. In most cases it makes sense to start by considering contact points in your immediate work environment first and then progress to higher levels (like institutional or national).

At the bottom of the page you can find some examples of problems you can run into and a list of descriptions of each contact point.

Your first contact points

Colleagues: Sometimes it can already help to talk with your colleagues about the issue you are experiencing. This will help you judge the severity of it and can provide you with allies in taking further action.

Daily supervisor*: Naturally, your daily supervisor is the first contact point for all issues. They can help you determine the next steps. Of course, you may not feel comfortable discussing everything with your supervisor, or maybe your daily supervisor is involved in the issue. In these cases have a look at the other available contact points.

Promotor or Co-Supervisor*: Especially, in cases of issues with your daily supervisor, consider reaching out to your promotor or another member on the supervision team and ask for a one-on-one meeting. Maybe they can (temporarily) step-up and help you resolve the issue.If you have a conflict with your supervisor(s), you can also have a look at the PNN PhD supervisor conflict roadmap.

*Note that your annual review talk with your supervisory team is a good opportunity to address issues or suggestions for improvement.

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

National contact points

Labor unions: Organizations representing the interests of academic staff, offering support on employment-related matters, rights, and fair treatment.

NWO Scientific Integrity Desk: A specialized desk addressing scientific integrity concerns in projects related to or funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

Netherlands Board of Research Integrity (LOWI): An independent body handling complaints related to scientific integrity, providing a platform for fair investigation. If you feel like the local scientific integrity committee at your institution did not handle a case correctly, the LOWI can be the next contact point.

Making a police report: In cases involving a criminal offense, please consider contacting local law enforcement to report incidents and seek assistance.

Examples

Unsure what kind of problems you can reach out for? You can take a look at some examples here but remember that no matter how big or small you feel your problem is, you can always reach out for help.
Workload and Time Management
Personal Well-being
Supervision and Mentorship
Workplace Environment
Career and Future Concerns

Descriptions

Here are some descriptions of each contact point:
Faculty PhD counil
Graduate School
Faculty Dean
PhD Mentor at faculty/department level
PhD organization
Company doctor
PhD Psychologist / Counsellor
HR advisor
Scientific Integrity advisor / committe
Confidential advisor
Share this post