BG
Want to know more?  Contact for advice.
Contact
Emma de Brabander
Treasurer and Labour conditions - universities
universities@hetpnn.nl

On commencement of the PhD trajectory, the law provides space for an employment contract with a term of 18 months (1,5 years) at most. This term functions as a probationary period, in addition to the usual 2 month probation period. In these first two months, both the employer and the employee can terminate the contract immediately. In the following months until the end of the first contract (of max. 18 months), this is not possible. However, to continue the PhD trajectory and extend the contract until the full 4 years (or other duration if agreed upon), first a go/no-go decision takes place. 

Note: it is possible for employers to make use of this option, but not necessary. It is also possible to receive a contract for 3 or 4 years from the beginning. This sometimes depends on e.g. regulations of the funder. 

If the employer did make use of this option, this first year to 1,5 years is a period in which both parties (i.e. the employer and the PhD candidate) can experience whether the PhD and project is a good match, whether the supervisory team is happy, and whether you, the PhD candidate, are happy. The go/no-go decision is therefore also a moment for you to decide whether they want to continue or not. It is important to know that deciding not to continue still allows you to apply for e.g. unemployment benefits, as this situation does not count as unemployed through own fault. 

The regulation regarding the go/no-go decision is mostly handled locally. Often, the progress in the first year will be discussed with your supervisor(s) within 8 to 14 months after the start of your contract.

Factors influencing a go/no-go-decision can include (as far as these were not yet hard requirements for your initial application):

  • A positive master’s diploma evaluation or a positive result of a qualifying examination,
  • Proof of proficiency in English,
  • Approval of your project proposal,
  • Approval of your Training and Supervision Plan,
  • Evaluations of your first-year ‘pilot study’,
  • A positive formal go/no-go decision by your promotor(es).

If there is doubt about your progress, your supervisors should discuss this with you. As soon as you have received a go for the rest of your PhD, the Human Resources (HR) department is not allowed to raise any more questions, for example about financial backing. This means that the finances should have been made available for the rest of your contract. 

The go/no-go decision shouldn’t come as a surprise. Of course, it is possible that it does come as a surprise. In that case, the local PhD regulations usually state what you can do to appeal such a decision. It is not always possible to reverse a negative go/no-go decision, but in the past there have been several cases of PhD candidates who were successful. 

Go/no-go decisions are only mandatory in case of employed PhD candidates who began their trajectory on a 12-18 month contract. External PhD candidates do not necessarily have to go through this process, but it is sometimes done as a replacement for a year review. This too is organised locally. 

Are you currently experiencing issues during your PhD that you need help with?

Most institutions have a number of contact points for help. This compass is designed to help you find the right support.

In the drop-down menu you can select the institution that you are doing your PhD at. Then the roadmap will show you available contact points. In most cases it makes sense to start by considering contact points in your immediate work environment first and then progress to higher levels (like institutional or national).

At the bottom of the page you can find some examples of problems you can run into and a list of descriptions of each contact point.

Your first contact points

Colleagues: Sometimes it can already help to talk with your colleagues about the issue you are experiencing. This will help you judge the severity of it and can provide you with allies in taking further action.

Daily supervisor*: Naturally, your daily supervisor is the first contact point for all issues. They can help you determine the next steps. Of course, you may not feel comfortable discussing everything with your supervisor, or maybe your daily supervisor is involved in the issue. In these cases have a look at the other available contact points.

Promotor or Co-Supervisor*: Especially, in cases of issues with your daily supervisor, consider reaching out to your promotor or another member on the supervision team and ask for a one-on-one meeting. Maybe they can (temporarily) step-up and help you resolve the issue.If you have a conflict with your supervisor(s), you can also have a look at the PNN PhD supervisor conflict roadmap.

*Note that your annual review talk with your supervisory team is a good opportunity to address issues or suggestions for improvement.

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

National contact points

Labor unions: Organizations representing the interests of academic staff, offering support on employment-related matters, rights, and fair treatment.

NWO Scientific Integrity Desk: A specialized desk addressing scientific integrity concerns in projects related to or funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

Netherlands Board of Research Integrity (LOWI): An independent body handling complaints related to scientific integrity, providing a platform for fair investigation. If you feel like the local scientific integrity committee at your institution did not handle a case correctly, the LOWI can be the next contact point.

Making a police report: In cases involving a criminal offense, please consider contacting local law enforcement to report incidents and seek assistance.

Examples

Unsure what kind of problems you can reach out for? You can take a look at some examples here but remember that no matter how big or small you feel your problem is, you can always reach out for help.
Workload and Time Management
Personal Well-being
Supervision and Mentorship
Workplace Environment
Career and Future Concerns

Descriptions

Here are some descriptions of each contact point:
Faculty PhD counil
Graduate School
Faculty Dean
PhD Mentor at faculty/department level
PhD organization
Company doctor
PhD Psychologist / Counsellor
HR advisor
Scientific Integrity advisor / committe
Confidential advisor
Share this post