BG
Want to know more?  Contact AG Elrod for advice.
Contact
Emma de Brabander
Labour conditions - universities
universities@hetpnn.nl

Writing a research plan can provide a strong start to your project. A research plan clearly formulates the aim of your research, how you will set up the study, and in what way the outcomes will be documented. This can help bring clarity to what you want to do and when, and if you prepare it together with your supervisor, it ensures that all parties have the same expectations and helps support the successful completion of your project. For PhD candidates, an approved research plan is often required in order to have their contract extended after the first 12 to 18 months.

There are various resources that offer guidance on writing a research plan. For example, Frank Pajares’ Elements of a Proposal” outlines the different components of a research plan.

Often, a research plan/proposal is also necessary if you wish to pursue a career in academia after your PhD. The article Writing a Research Plan by Jim Austin, editor of Science Careers, provides an engaging perspective on how to convince reviewers to approve your project. The article On the Art of Writing Proposals by Adam Przeworski and Frank Salomon offers tips and tricks for writing successful proposals in the social sciences.

Each of these articles provides advice in its own way on how to write a successful research plan. It is important to extract the elements that apply most to your situation. Most importantly, make sure you have a research plan in place before you actually begin carrying out the research. Think carefully in advance about the steps you intend to follow. These resources can serve as useful guides. Equally important—if not more so—is to have thorough discussions with your supervisor(s) and colleagues about your research proposal.

Formal Basis – Research Plan

In the Collective Labour Agreement (CAO) for Dutch Universities, Article 6.9 – Training and Supervision Plan for PhD Candidates, the following has been agreed:

  • After consultation with the PhD candidate, the supervisor (or promotor) must establish a training and supervision plan. This plan must be provided to the PhD candidate within 3 months of the start of employment.
  • The training and supervision plan must be further specified towards the end of the first year for the remainder of the appointment and updated annually if necessary.
  • The training and supervision plan must at minimum specify:
    • Which knowledge and skills must be acquired, and how this will be achieved.
    • Who will act as the PhD candidate’s supervisor. If the daily supervisor is not the promotor, the promotor must have at least one formal discussion per year with the PhD candidate about the doctoral research.
    • The number of hours per month of personal supervision the PhD candidate is entitled to from the designated supervisor.

Are you currently experiencing issues during your PhD that you need help with?

Most institutions have a number of contact points for help. This compass is designed to help you find the right support.

In the drop-down menu you can select the institution that you are doing your PhD at. Then the roadmap will show you available contact points. In most cases it makes sense to start by considering contact points in your immediate work environment first and then progress to higher levels (like institutional or national).

At the bottom of the page you can find some examples of problems you can run into and a list of descriptions of each contact point.

Your first contact points

Colleagues: Sometimes it can already help to talk with your colleagues about the issue you are experiencing. This will help you judge the severity of it and can provide you with allies in taking further action.

Daily supervisor*: Naturally, your daily supervisor is the first contact point for all issues. They can help you determine the next steps. Of course, you may not feel comfortable discussing everything with your supervisor, or maybe your daily supervisor is involved in the issue. In these cases have a look at the other available contact points.

Promotor or Co-Supervisor*: Especially, in cases of issues with your daily supervisor, consider reaching out to your promotor or another member on the supervision team and ask for a one-on-one meeting. Maybe they can (temporarily) step-up and help you resolve the issue.If you have a conflict with your supervisor(s), you can also have a look at the PNN PhD supervisor conflict roadmap.

*Note that your annual review talk with your supervisory team is a good opportunity to address issues or suggestions for improvement.

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

National contact points

Labor unions: Organizations representing the interests of academic staff, offering support on employment-related matters, rights, and fair treatment.

NWO Scientific Integrity Desk: A specialized desk addressing scientific integrity concerns in projects related to or funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

Netherlands Board of Research Integrity (LOWI): An independent body handling complaints related to scientific integrity, providing a platform for fair investigation. If you feel like the local scientific integrity committee at your institution did not handle a case correctly, the LOWI can be the next contact point.

Making a police report: In cases involving a criminal offense, please consider contacting local law enforcement to report incidents and seek assistance.

Examples

Unsure what kind of problems you can reach out for? You can take a look at some examples here but remember that no matter how big or small you feel your problem is, you can always reach out for help.
Workload and Time Management
Personal Well-being
Supervision and Mentorship
Workplace Environment
Career and Future Concerns

Descriptions

Here are some descriptions of each contact point:
Faculty PhD counil
Graduate School
Faculty Dean
PhD Mentor at faculty/department level
PhD organization
Company doctor
PhD Psychologist / Counsellor
HR advisor
Scientific Integrity advisor / committe
Confidential advisor
Share this post