Tips for PhD Candidates

BG
Want to know more?  Contact AG Elrod for advice.
Contact
Benthe van Wanrooij
Chair
chair@hetpnn.nl

In this article, we've put together some tips for you to have a successful PhD trajectory. Of course, not all of these tips will be applicable to everyone, but we hope that by reading them, you'll be better prepared for what a promotion trajectory entails and how you can contribute to a successful defense!

Take initiative!

This applies to everything, whether it's the direction of your research or a lack of guidance. Many things can be solved by yourself. For example, if your supervisor wants to take the research in a different direction than you do, explore the possibilities together. Perhaps multiple theories or methods can be used side-by-side? If not, keep in mind that your supervisor is an experienced scientist who wants to guide you in a direction where they have the most expertise, and you can learn a lot from them in that field as a beginning researcher. Additionally, in the discussion section of your dissertation, you can diplomatically address the advantages and disadvantages of the method and make suggestions for alternative research methods. Furthermore, you should be mindful of your position. Someone who has only been there for two months is likely to accomplish less than a PhD candidate who has been there for three years. However, fundamental choices may have already been made by that point.

Write, write, write!

One important recommendation that PhD candiates from the research school in communication science (NESCoR) gave to beginning PhD candidates is to start writing quickly. By putting something on paper (such as a working paper), your colleagues can read your work and start a discussion. Additionally, this paper could potentially be turned into an article with the help of feedback from colleagues. Writing articles during your PhD research generally increases your value on the academic job market. Additionally, writing experience will help you improve your writing skills, and feedback from scientists in the field can be used to enhance your PhD research.

Ensure adequate guidance

If you're not getting enough guidance, seek out more mentors yourself. This could be a postdoc who is doing research in the same area as you. The benefit of this is that they are close to you as they have recently been through the same process. Suggest to your supervisor to make this person a "daily supervisor" or "co-supervisor." Another option is to establish a guidance committee. Find multiple people who are working on the same topic or have expertise in another relevant field. Discuss with your supervisor what they think of the idea and whether they have any suggestions for members of the guidance committee. Write a letter to the members of the guidance committee outlining the process. For example, the committee should meet at least once a year, and committee members are expected to provide feedback on interim products. Keep in mind that as more people are involved in the project, there is a greater chance of conflicting advice being given. Additionally, decision-making and discussions may take longer as a result.

Attend conferences

It is recommended that you present a portion of your PhD research in the form of a paper at a scientific conference. The feedback you receive can be very useful. For example, you may receive feedback on points that you had not previously considered. Additionally, it is encouraging to talk to scientists who are conducting research in the same or similar fields.

Courses

See if there are any courses in relevant areas. Courses from the research school are the most obvious. If they are not available, look at courses from research schools in related fields, either in terms of content or methodology. Additionally, you may consider general courses such as courses on project planning, scientific writing, or statistics.

Local PhD council
Get in touch with the local PhD council. The local councils keep PhD candidates well informed about what is happening, and experiences can also be exchanged with other PhD candidates.

Research and Graduate schools

When you start your PhD, you may automatically be enrolled in a research school or graduate schoolThis can have several benefits, such as offering courses that may be of interest to you. Additionally, in some cases, you may be able to access funds from these schools for courses outside your own research school or for attending conferences. Some of these schools also offer a bonus if you complete your PhD within four years.

However, there may be cases where you're not automatically enrolled in a research school or graduate school. If this happens, it's a good idea to take the initiative and contact a research school or graduate school yourself, ideally in consultation with your supervisor.

Performance review

You should also request a meeting with your supervisor to discuss your progress. During this meeting, you should clearly communicate your expectations, any difficulties you're facing, questions about the research, and your plans for the rest of your PhD. It's also recommended to create an outline and timeline for your research progress, so that you know where you stand. You can revisit this outline and timeline during your next meeting with your supervisor.

Agreements on authorship

Before starting a joint article, it's important to establish clear agreements on authorship. Generally, the person who writes the first draft of the article (and does most of the work) is the first author. If your data is used, you should be included as a co-author. According to Fine & Kurdek (1993), the PhD candidate usually takes first authorship in the case of a jointly authored article that is mainly based on the candidate's research. You can also refer to the guidelines of the ethical committee of the American Psychological Association (1983).

Read the promotion regulations

Make sure to read your university's PhD regulations before starting your PhD to avoid any unpleasant surprises. These regulations outline the requirements for starting a PhD, the rules for the PhD trajectory, and the procedure for the promotion itself.

Correspondence

Finally, it's a good idea to keep a record of all correspondence with your supervisor. Since much of the correspondence may be via email, create a special folder to save these emails.

Are you currently experiencing issues during your PhD that you need help with?

Most institutions have a number of contact points for help. This compass is designed to help you find the right support.

In the drop-down menu you can select the institution that you are doing your PhD at. Then the roadmap will show you available contact points. In most cases it makes sense to start by considering contact points in your immediate work environment first and then progress to higher levels (like institutional or national).

At the bottom of the page you can find some examples of problems you can run into and a list of descriptions of each contact point.

Your first contact points

Colleagues: Sometimes it can already help to talk with your colleagues about the issue you are experiencing. This will help you judge the severity of it and can provide you with allies in taking further action.

Daily supervisor*: Naturally, your daily supervisor is the first contact point for all issues. They can help you determine the next steps. Of course, you may not feel comfortable discussing everything with your supervisor, or maybe your daily supervisor is involved in the issue. In these cases have a look at the other available contact points.

Promotor or Co-Supervisor*: Especially, in cases of issues with your daily supervisor, consider reaching out to your promotor or another member on the supervision team and ask for a one-on-one meeting. Maybe they can (temporarily) step-up and help you resolve the issue.If you have a conflict with your supervisor(s), you can also have a look at the PNN PhD supervisor conflict roadmap.

*Note that your annual review talk with your supervisory team is a good opportunity to address issues or suggestions for improvement.

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

National contact points

Labor unions: Organizations representing the interests of academic staff, offering support on employment-related matters, rights, and fair treatment.

NWO Scientific Integrity Desk: A specialized desk addressing scientific integrity concerns in projects related to or funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

Netherlands Board of Research Integrity (LOWI): An independent body handling complaints related to scientific integrity, providing a platform for fair investigation. If you feel like the local scientific integrity committee at your institution did not handle a case correctly, the LOWI can be the next contact point.

Making a police report: In cases involving a criminal offense, please consider contacting local law enforcement to report incidents and seek assistance.

Examples

Unsure what kind of problems you can reach out for? You can take a look at some examples here but remember that no matter how big or small you feel your problem is, you can always reach out for help.
Workload and Time Management
Personal Well-being
Supervision and Mentorship
Workplace Environment
Career and Future Concerns

Descriptions

Here are some descriptions of each contact point:
Faculty PhD counil
Graduate School
Faculty Dean
PhD Mentor at faculty/department level
PhD organization
Company doctor
PhD Psychologist / Counsellor
HR advisor
Scientific Integrity advisor / committe
Confidential advisor
Share this post