BG
Want to know more?  Contact AG Elrod for advice.
Contact
Ilse Visser
Secretary and vice chair
secretary@hetpnn.nl

Research has shown that 80% of the PhD candidates aspire a career in science after their promotion. However, for only 20% of all doctoral students an appointment at the university is a possibility, another 10% is in research-related positions outside the university. The remaining 70% will end in positions in business, or for the government.

The competition for an appointment at the university after the promotion is huge! Only a few PhD candidates directly get offered an appointment at the university. The most logical step is to apply for a post-doc position. This is a temporary position for 2-4 years, focused on a specific research topic. Besides applying for a post-doc feature it is possible to write a grant application, and thus create your own appointment. For beginning doctorates the most common grants are the Rubicon, to gain experience to another (foreign) institution, and the VENI, where you do a proposal for post-doctoral research. Also for grants, the competition is fierce. For more information check out our vacancy page.

In addition to a career in science, a career outside science an option after the promotion. For example, you can think of policy positions in government and management and consulting positions in business. If you already know you want to continue in business during your promotion, it helps you to orientate during your PhD project, and where possible expand your network. Many companies in the Netherlands do not immediately see the added value of a doctoral degree, above a master’s degree. However, remember that PhD candidates generally have excellent analytical and organizational skills and have learned to present their research. You did successfully complete a complex project!

Dat de meeste promovendi goed terechtkomen blijkt uit het feit dat van de 60 duizend gepromoveerden die Nederland in de periode 2007/2010 rijk was, meer dan 80 procent een baan op wetenschappelijk niveau heeft. Onder niet-gepromoveerde academici is dit iets meer dan de helft. Daarnaast is er onder gepromoveerden een hogere arbeidsparticipatie en werken gepromoveerden vaker voltijds dan niet-gepromoveerden. Voor meer informatie zie: CBS.

Career prospects are not always as good as you would like them to be

Generally, PhD Candidates expect that with four years of experience with doctoral research their career prospects improve compared to the period immediately after their graduation. Especially for doctoral students in the ‘HOOP-areas’ Economics, Law, Behaviour and Society, Language and Culture, this is only the case when PhD candidates gained general skills interesting to potential employers, along with specific knowledge in their field of research. PNN is committed to providing opportunities for PhD candidates to develop this general skills and to create opportunities for PhD candidates to get in touch with potential employers.

For PhD candidates in the areas Agriculture, Nature, Technology, and Health, there is generally more supply of specific, often R&D-related positions, outside of academia (Quick-scan Young Talent in Science). The Dutch government should support the importance of this group of highly qualified young researchers, in part due to their contribution to the growth of the Dutch knowledge economy, and actively ensure the development of transferable skills and career opportunities for PhD graduates.

The FNV has published a brief overview of recent developments in this area as a result of their study "Arbeidsmarktperspectief hoger onderwijs" (Labour market perspective in Higher Education)

Only 20% of the PhD Candidates find a job in science

PhD candidates make up about 35% of the academic staff. Within this group, the universities aren’t able to offer career prospects for 80% (see this article from Statistics Netherlands) . Besides the responsibility of the PhD Candidates, it is also the responsibility of universities to provide the proper information concerning career prospects and also provide courses and the time to develop transferable skills.

Many employers outside academia appreciate PhD Candidates because of their specific knowledge and skills in a specific discipline, while PhD Candidates are foremost a group of highly talented individuals who possess a broad range of versatile skills, or transferable skills.

Unlock your future!

Curious about your transferable skills? Want to work on your CV, research proposal, and a powerful personal pitch? Ready to use and expand your career network? AcademicTransfer offers a free ebook, where you will find a wealth of information and tips & tricks to prepare you well for your next career step, inside or just outside science. Download the ebook now!

Are you currently experiencing issues during your PhD that you need help with?

Most institutions have a number of contact points for help. This compass is designed to help you find the right support.

In the drop-down menu you can select the institution that you are doing your PhD at. Then the roadmap will show you available contact points. In most cases it makes sense to start by considering contact points in your immediate work environment first and then progress to higher levels (like institutional or national).

At the bottom of the page you can find some examples of problems you can run into and a list of descriptions of each contact point.

Your first contact points

Colleagues: Sometimes it can already help to talk with your colleagues about the issue you are experiencing. This will help you judge the severity of it and can provide you with allies in taking further action.

Daily supervisor*: Naturally, your daily supervisor is the first contact point for all issues. They can help you determine the next steps. Of course, you may not feel comfortable discussing everything with your supervisor, or maybe your daily supervisor is involved in the issue. In these cases have a look at the other available contact points.

Promotor or Co-Supervisor*: Especially, in cases of issues with your daily supervisor, consider reaching out to your promotor or another member on the supervision team and ask for a one-on-one meeting. Maybe they can (temporarily) step-up and help you resolve the issue.If you have a conflict with your supervisor(s), you can also have a look at the PNN PhD supervisor conflict roadmap.

*Note that your annual review talk with your supervisory team is a good opportunity to address issues or suggestions for improvement.

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

Institutional Level

Faculty / Department / Graduate School Level

National contact points

Labor unions: Organizations representing the interests of academic staff, offering support on employment-related matters, rights, and fair treatment.

NWO Scientific Integrity Desk: A specialized desk addressing scientific integrity concerns in projects related to or funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).

Netherlands Board of Research Integrity (LOWI): An independent body handling complaints related to scientific integrity, providing a platform for fair investigation. If you feel like the local scientific integrity committee at your institution did not handle a case correctly, the LOWI can be the next contact point.

Making a police report: In cases involving a criminal offense, please consider contacting local law enforcement to report incidents and seek assistance.

Examples

Unsure what kind of problems you can reach out for? You can take a look at some examples here but remember that no matter how big or small you feel your problem is, you can always reach out for help.
Workload and Time Management
Personal Well-being
Supervision and Mentorship
Workplace Environment
Career and Future Concerns

Descriptions

Here are some descriptions of each contact point:
Faculty PhD counil
Graduate School
Faculty Dean
PhD Mentor at faculty/department level
PhD organization
Company doctor
PhD Psychologist / Counsellor
HR advisor
Scientific Integrity advisor / committe
Confidential advisor
Share this post